AAOS conducted a systematic review that identified two diagnostic studies40, 41 addressing this recommendation. One of these studies evaluated the diagnostic performance of clinical examination with radiographs and of selective MRI in the evaluation of intra-articular knee disorders by comparing these findings with arthroscopic findings.40 The clinical diagnosis (from the initial visit), MRI diagnosis (from the MRI report), and the arthroscopic diagnosis (from the operative report) were retrospectively reviewed and compared. Since only a subset of all patients that underwent evaluation of intra-articular knee disorders proceeded to arthroscopic evaluation, this diagnostic study does not universally apply the reference standard of arthroscopy. Consequently, this retrospective diagnostic study without a universally applied reference standard was evaluated as a Level II study.
Similarly, the second diagnostic study identified in the systematic review, prospectively evaluated all consecutive patients undergoing knee arthroscopy who had a preoperative MRI.41 Again, this study only reports on the subset of patients that required surgery; therefore, this diagnostic study does not universally apply the reference standard of arthroscopy. Consequently, this prospective diagnostic study without a universally applied reference standard is also evaluated as a Level II study.
These Level II studies, when considered together, may have supported a moderate strength of recommendation. However, these studies found that both x-ray and MRI are good rule in tests and do not address the incremental diagnostic value of an MRI in the setting of known OCD determined by x-ray. That is, these studies do not compare the diagnostic performance of clinical examination with standard radiographs to clinical examination with standard radiographs and an MRI; therefore we downgraded the strength of this recommendation to limited.
In addition to identifying the presence of OCD lesions and distinguishing OCD lesions from other intra-articular pathology, an MRI may be used as an adjunct to clinical examination with radiographs to provide additional information that will guide therapeutic decision-making. Of the 5 therapeutic studies42-46 that were included in the development of this guideline, three studies 42-44 report the acquisition of an MRI at enrollment and three studies42, 44, 45 report the acquisition of an MRI at follow-up evaluation. Further, one prognostic study19 predicts the healing potential of stable OCD lesions, utilizing a multivariable logistic regression model. Of all of the variables that were considered (including sex, side, location, symptoms, knee dimensions, and lesion dimensions), only knee symptoms as well as normalized length and normalized width of the OCD lesion as measured on MRI were found to be predictive of healing potential.
Of note, three studies47-49 correlated MRI findings with arthroscopic findings in patients with OCD of the knee. The evidence for assessment of stability of an OCD lesion was inconsistent.
Supporting Evidence
A single study assessed the pre-operative diagnosis of a pediatric orthopaedic surgeon, which included clinical examination, radiographs, and consideration of the MRI findings.41 This study enrolled 131 patients with various knee lesions, 19 of which were diagnosed as having OCD during arthroscopic examination. Diagnostic performance estimates from this study reflect the value of a pediatric orthopaedic surgeon’s pre- operative diagnosis to correctly identify OCD from several other lesions. Analysis of likelihood ratios (LR) and associated confidence intervals indicates that diagnosis based on exam, x-rays, and MRI findings is a good rule in and a good, moderately good, or weak rule out test for OCD (XTable 7X). However, the use of a single surgeon’s pre- operative diagnosis reduces the generalizability of these results.
Two studies evaluated the ability of MRI to distinguish OCD from several other lesions.40, 41 The studies enrolled 256 patients with various knee lesions, 41 of which were diagnosed as having OCD during arthroscopic examination. Likelihood ratios and the associated confidence intervals indicate MRI is a good or moderately good rule in test and a good, moderately good, or weak rule out test for OCD ( able 8).
In the three remaining studies (n = 124), MRI was evaluated for the ability to diagnose instability of the osteochondritis dissecans.47-49 Instability at MRI was based on similar criteria, including high signal rims/lines, cysts, and focal defects (XTable 9). One study reported the results of skeletally mature patients separately from skeletally immature patients.48 Ninety-one percent (91%) of the patients in one study were skeletally immature 49 and 81% of the patients skeletally mature in the remaining study.47 Thus, we analyzed the likelihood ratios and the associated confidence intervals for skeletally immature patients and skeletally mature patients separately.
The analysis in skeletally immature patients indicates MRI is good, moderately good, weak, or poor as a rule in and rule out test for instability of OCD (Table 10)X MRI is a good, moderately good, weak, or poor rule in test for OCD instability in skeletally mature patients and a good, moderately good, or weak rule out test for OCD instability in skeletally mature patients ( able 11)
- (40) Kocher MS, DiCanzio J, Zurakowski D, Micheli LJ. Diagnostic performance of clinical examination and selective magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of intraarticular knee disorders in children and adolescents. Am J Sports Med 2001;29(3):292-296.
- (41) Luhmann SJ, Schootman M, Gordon JE, Wright RW. Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee in children and adolescents. Its role in clinical decision-making. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87(3):497-502.
- (47) De Smet AA, Fisher DR, Graf BK, Lange RH. Osteochondritis dissecans of the knee: value of MR imaging in determining lesion stability and the presence of articular cartilage defects. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1990;155(3):549-553.
- (48) Kijowski R, Blankenbaker DG, Shinki K, Fine JP, Graf BK, De Smet AA. Juvenile versus adult osteochondritis dissecans of the knee: appropriate MR imaging criteria for instability. Radiology 2008;248(2):571-578.
- (49) O'Connor MA, Palaniappan M, Khan N, Bruce CE. Osteochondritis dissecans of the knee in children. A comparison of MRI and arthroscopic findings. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002;84(2):258-262.
- Figueroa, D., Figueroa, F., Calvo, R., Zilleruelo, N., Serrano, G., Arellano, S. Is There Any Correlation Between Short-Term MRI And Mid-Term Clinical Results in Patients Undergoing An Osteochondral Autograft In The Knee?. Acta Orthop Belg 2017; 4: 650-658
- Brown, M. L., McCauley, J. C., Gracitelli, G. C., Bugbee, W. D. Osteochondritis Dissecans Lesion Location Is Highly Concordant With Mechanical Axis Deviation. Am J Sports Med 2020; 4: 871-875
- Vasiliadis, H. S., Danielson, B., Ljungberg, M., McKeon, B., Lindahl, A., Peterson, L. Autologous chondrocyte implantation in cartilage lesions of the knee: long-term evaluation with magnetic resonance imaging and delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging technique. Am J Sports Med 2010; 5: 943-9
- Hancock, G. E., Hampton, M. J., Broadley, P., Ali, F. M., Nicolaou, N.. (2021). Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging of the knee for intra-articular pathology in children: A comparison of 3T versus 1.5T imaging. Journal of Arthroscopy and Joint Surgery, 8(2), 172-176. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jajs.2021.02.010
- Heywood, C. S., Benke, M. T., Brindle, K., Fine, K. M. Correlation of magnetic resonance imaging to arthroscopic findings of stability in juvenile osteochondritis dissecans. Arthroscopy 2011; 2: 194-9
- Kamei, G., Adachi, N., Deie, M., Nakamae, A., Nakasa, T., Shibuya, H., Okuhara, A., Niimoto, T., Kazusa, H., Ohkawa, S., Takazawa, K., Eguchi, A., Ochi, M. Characteristic shape of the lateral femoral condyle in patients with osteochondritis dissecans accompanied by a discoid lateral meniscus. J Orthop Sci 2012; 2: 124-8
- Feroe, A. G., Flaugh, R. A., Majumdar, A., Baxter, T. A., Miller, P. E., Kocher, M. S.. (2022). Validation of a Novel Magnetic Resonance Imaging Classification for Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Knee. J Pediatr Orthop, 42(5), e486-e491.
- Jungesblut, O. D., Berger-Groch, J., Meenen, N. M., Stuecker, R., Rupprecht, M. Validity of Ultrasound Compared with Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Evaluation of Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Distal Femur in Children. Cartilage 2019; 0: 1947603519828434
- Siegall, E., Faust, J. R., Herzog, M. M., Marshall, K. W., Willimon, S. C., Busch, M. T. Age Predicts Disruption of the Articular Surface of the Femoral Condyles in Knee OCD: Can We Reduce Usage of Arthroscopy and MRI?. J Pediatr Orthop 2018; 3: 176-180
- Roc?bach, B. P., Paulus, A. C., Niethammer, T. R., Wegener, V., Gülecyüz, M. F., Jansson, V., Müller, P. E., Utzschneider, S. Discrepancy between morphological findings in juvenile osteochondritis dissecans (OCD): a comparison of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and arthroscopy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016; 4: 1259-64
- Ellermann, J. M., Donald, B., Rohr, S., Takahashi, T., Tompkins, M., Nelson, B., Crawford, A., Rud, C., Macalena, J. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Osteochondritis Dissecans: Validation Study for the ICRS Classification System. Acad Radiol 2016; 6: 724-9
- Chen, C. H., Liu, Y. S., Chou, P. H., Hsieh, C. C., Wang, C. K. MR grading system of osteochondritis dissecans lesions: comparison with arthroscopy. Eur J Radiol 2013; 3: 518-25
- Gans, I., Bedoya, M. A., Ho-Fung, V., Ganley, T. J. Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging and pre-surgical evaluation in the assessment of traumatic intra-articular knee disorders in children and adolescents: what conditions still pose diagnostic challenges?. Pediatr Radiol 2015; 2: 194-202