Lumbar Plexus Block vs Peri-Articular Local Anesthetic Infiltration in THA
There is no difference between a single-shot lumbar plexus nerve block or peri-articular local anesthetic infiltration in postoperative pain or opioid consumption after primary total hip arthroplasty.
Anesthesia and Analgesia in Total Joint Arthroplasty (2021)
Developed by: American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons, American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, The Hip Society, and The Knee Society

Rationale

Among the clinically relevant regional nerve blocks for primary THA, a single high quality randomized clinical trial compared a fascia iliaca compartment block and peri-articular local anesthetic infiltration, and a single high quality randomized clinical trial compared a lumbar plexus nerve block and peri-articular local anesthetic infiltration.[16, 17] Both randomized clinical trials demonstrated peri-articular local anesthetic infiltration is equivalent to either a fascia iliaca compartment or lumbar plexus nerve block regarding postoperative pain and opioid consumption.[16, 17] Peri-articular local anesthetic infiltration should be considered first before resorting to a regional nerve block in primary THA because the additional cost and risk associated with a regional nerve block do not offer any additional benefit compared to peri-articular local anesthetic infiltration. Therefore, we recommend the use of peri-articular local anesthetic infiltration over the routine use of regional nerve blocks following primary THA. However, if a patient‘s circumstance does warrant a regional nerve block, we recommend use of a fascia iliaca compartment block.