There were two clinical diagnostic tests studied in high quality investigations, the Katz Hand Diagram and the CTS-6. The Boston Carpal Tunnel Scale, a status instrument most frequently used to measure outcomes of treatment for CTS was also evaluated in two high quality studies.
In comparison to electrodiagnostic testing Katz et al demonstrated high sensitivity (0.96) and good negative predictive value (0.91) for the “classic”, “probable” or “possible” designations however, positive predictive value and specificity were low. This indicates that, using electrodiagnostic testing as a reference standard, the Katz Hand Diagram used in this way had more value as a “rule out test”. Sensitivity decreased and specificity increased if comparison to electrodiagnostic tests was made only using “classic” or “probable” results. Sensitivity decreased further and specificity was commensurately increased when only “classic” results were compared to electrodiagnostic testing. Defined using only “classic” or “classic” or “probable” results the Katz Hand Diagram was considered weak or poor as either a “rule in” or “rule out” test. Vanti made similar observations using AANEM electrodiagnostic definitions for CTS in demonstrating that the “classic” or “probable” results functioned as a strong “rule out” test.
Graham took a different approach to evaluating the respective roles of electrodiagnostic testing and the CTS-6, an instrument that expresses the probability of CTS. The pre-test probability of CTS was established using the CTS-6 and then the post-test probability after electrodiagnostic testing was estimated using likelihood ratios established with two electrodiagnostic standards for CTS, one lax (with higher sensitivity and lower specificity) and one stringent (with lower sensitivity and higher specificity). This study showed that the changes in probability after electrodiagnostic testing, using either electrodiagnostic definition, were small and probably below a clinically relevant standard. This suggests that the most appropriate setting for electrodiagnostic testing is where there is uncertainty about the clinical diagnosis.
There were two high quality studies evaluating the Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (Wainner, Naranjo). Both of these studies used electrodiagnostic tests as the reference standard. The results were consistent in both studies in showing that this instrument functioned as either a weak or poor “rule in” or “rule out” test. This may have been due to the fact that the scale was actually developed as a status instrument rather than as a diagnostic scale.
- Bonauto,D.K.; Silverstein,B.A.; Fan,Z.J.; Smith,C.K.; Wilcox,D.N. Evaluation of a symptom diagram for identifying carpal tunnel syndrome. Occup.Med (Lond); 2008/12: 8
- Calfee,R.P.; Dale,A.M.; Ryan,D.; Descatha,A.; Franzblau,A.; Evanoff,B. Performance of simplified scoring systems for hand diagrams in carpal tunnel syndrome screening. J Hand Surg Am; 2012/1: 1
- Cartwright,M.S.; Walker,F.O.; Blocker,J.N.; Schulz,M.R.; Arcury,T.A.; Grzywacz,J.G.; Mora,D.; Chen,H.; Marin,A.J.; Quandt,S.A. Ultrasound for carpal tunnel syndrome screening in manual laborers. Muscle Nerve; 2013/7: 1
- Dale,A.M.; Descatha,A.; Coomes,J.; Franzblau,A.; Evanoff,B. Physical examination has a low yield in screening for carpal tunnel syndrome. Am J Ind.Med; 2011/1: 1
- Gomes,I.; Becker,J.; Ehlers,J.A.; Nora,D.B. Prediction of the neurophysiological diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome from the demographic and clinical data. Clin Neurophysiol.; 2006/5: 5
- Graham,B. The value added by electrodiagnostic testing in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008/12: 12
- Katz,J.N.; Larson,M.G.; Fossel,A.H.; Liang,M.H. Validation of a surveillance case definition of carpal tunnel syndrome. Am J Public Health; 1991/2: 2
- Katz,J.N.; Larson,M.G.; Sabra,A.; Krarup,C.; Stirrat,C.R.; Sethi,R.; Eaton,H.M.; Fossel,A.H.; Liang,M.H. The carpal tunnel syndrome: diagnostic utility of the history and physical examination findings. Ann.Intern.Med; 1990/3/1: 5
- Katz,J.N.; Stirrat,C.R. A self-administered hand diagram for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am; 1990/3: 2
- Katz,J.N.; Stirrat,C.R.; Larson,M.G.; Fossel,A.H.; Eaton,H.M.; Liang,M.H. A self-administered hand symptom diagram for the diagnosis and epidemiologic study of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Rheumatol.; 1990/11: 11
- Naranjo,A.; Ojeda,S.; Mendoza,D.; Francisco,F.; Quevedo,J.C.; Erausquin,C. What is the diagnostic value of ultrasonography compared to physical evaluation in patients with idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome?. Clin Exp.Rheumatol.; 2007/11: 6
- Vanti,C.; Bonfiglioli,R.; Calabrese,M.; Marinelli,F.; Violante,F.S.; Pillastrini,P. Relationship between interpretation and accuracy of the upper limb neurodynamic test 1 in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2012/1: 1
- Wainner,R.S.; Fritz,J.M.; Irrgang,J.J.; Delitto,A.; Allison,S.; Boninger,M.L. Development of a clinical prediction rule for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil.; 2005/4: 4
- Yagci,I.; Gunduz,O.H.; Sancak,S.; Agirman,M.; Mesci,E.; Akyuz,G. Comparative electrophysiological techniques in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome in patients with diabetic polyneuropathy. Diabetes Res.Clin Pract.; 2010/5: 2