Peri-Articular Local Anesthetic Infiltration
Strong evidence supports that the use of peri-articular local anesthetic infiltration in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) decreases pain and opioid use compared to placebo.
Surgical Management of Osteoarthritis of the Knee
Endorsed by: The Knee Society, SOMOS, AAHKS, ACR, AGS, AANA

Rationale
Five high quality studies (Nakai 2013, Koh 2011, Klasen 1999, Busch 2006, Chen 2012) compared peri-articular infiltration (PAI) to placebo (normal saline or no infiltration) for total knee arthroplasty. Improved function (Chen 2012), lower opioid consumption Busch 2006, Chen 2012, improved patient satisfaction (Busch 2006), and lower visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores (Nakai 2013, Koh 2011, Busch 2006, Chen 2012) all favored peri-articular injection.
 
Twenty-seven high quality studies originally met the selection criteria. Comparisons between PAI and placebo, PAI and peripheral nerve blocks (femoral and/or sciatic nerve blocks), and PAI and epidural blocks were attempted. However, due to the heterogeneity of the studies, PAI could only be compared to placebo. The heterogeneity of the studies included differences in infiltration solution (long-acting local anesthetics, plus or minus ketorolac, plus or minus opioid, plus or minus corticosteroid), varying concentrations of infiltration solution and injections, single-injection or catheter peripheral nerve blocks, peripheral nerve blocks (femoral and/or sciatic), and epidural catheter infusions (local anesthetic, opioid, and rates). 
 

LEARN MORE ABOUT AAOS

The Future of OrthoGuidelines

FIND OUT MORE

The OrthoGuidelines Process