Combining the autograft and nonirradiated allograft data from two studies, there was a 6% failure rate with autograft and a 9% failure rate with nonirradiated allograft, which was not a statistically significant difference.111, 112 In contrast, there was a 34% failure rate with irradiated allograft (2.5 Mrad). The difference between failures in the autograft group and the irradiated allograft group was statistically significant.
Five moderate strength prospective comparative studies, similarly demonstrated that the clinical outcomes of ACL reconstruction with allograft were not significantly different from those with autograft.26, 62, 63, 84, 117
The allografts used in the study by Gorschewsky et al. were sterilized with osmotic treatment, oxidation, and solvent drying with acetone.39 In contrast, the other studies involved the use of fresh-frozen allografts or cryopreservation. The patient-oriented outcomes, physical examination findings, instrumented laxity measurements, and complications in the allograft group in the study by Gorschewsky et al. were much worse than those in the other treatment arms of the other five prospective comparative studies. 26, 39, 62, 63, 84, 117
While outcomes following ACL reconstruction using autograft tissue and using non-irradiated allograft tissue are similar overall, these results may not be generalizable to specific subsets of patients with ACL rupture, such as athletes and young patients. In fact, a longitudinal cohort study indicated a higher failure rate of allograft tissue in younger patients (Figure 3, Kaeding -- Sports Health 2011).
Potential Harms of Implementation
As with all surgery procedures, there are surgical risks and complications including but not limited to graft failure, arthrofibrosis, infection, neurovascular injury, and anesthetic complications. With ACL reconstruction using autograft tissue, there are specific additional risks of donor site morbidity, including risk of patellar fracture and long-term kneeling pain (with autograft bone-patellar tendon-bone) as well as risk of saphenous nerve trauma and long-term knee flexor strength deficit (with autograft hamstring tendon). With ACL reconstruction using allograft tissue, there are specific additional risks of potential for disease transmission and limited availability.
While outcomes following ACL reconstruction using autograft tissue and using non-irradiated allograft tissue are similar overall, these results may not be generalizable to specific subsets of patients with ACL rupture, such as elite athletes and very young patients. Specifically, further research is needed to assess the outcomes following ACL reconstruction using autograft tissue and using non-irradiated allograft tissue in patients with specific activity levels (including elite athletes), ages (including the young and very young), and associated injuries.
Further research is needed to assess the outcomes following ACL reconstruction using autograft tissue and using non-irradiated allograft tissue in patients with specific activity levels (including elite athletes), ages (including the young and very young), and associated injuries.
- (111) Sun K, Zhang J, Wang Y et al. Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with at least 2.5 years' follow-up comparing hamstring tendon autograft and irradiated allograft. Arthroscopy 2011;27:1195-1202.
- (112) Sun K, Zhang J, Wang Y et al. Arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with hamstring tendon autograft and fresh-frozen allograft: a prospective, randomized controlled study. Am J Sports Med 2011;39:1430-1438.
- (113) Sun K, Zhang J, Wang Y et al. A prospective randomized comparison of irradiated and non-irradiated hamstring tendon allograft for ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012;20:187-194.
- (117) Victor J, Bellemans J, Witvrouw E, Govaers K, Fabry G. Graft selection in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction--prospective analysis of patellar tendon autografts compared with allografts. Int Orthop 1997;21:93-97.
- (26) Edgar CM, Zimmer S, Kakar S, Jones H, Schepsis AA. Prospective comparison of auto and allograft hamstring tendon constructs for ACL reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008;466:2238-2246.
- (39) Gorschewsky O, Klakow A, Riechert K, Pitzl M, Becker R. Clinical comparison of the Tutoplast allograft and autologous patellar tendon (bone-patellar tendon-bone) for the reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: 2- and 6-year results. Am J Sports Med 2005;33:1202-1209.
- (62) Lawhorn KW, Howell SM, Traina SM, Gottlieb JE, Meade TD, Freedberg HI. The effect of graft tissue on anterior cruciate ligament outcomes: a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing autograft hamstrings with fresh-frozen anterior tibialis allograft. Arthroscopy 2012;28:1079-1086.
- (63) Leal-Blanquet J, Alentorn-Geli E, Tuneu J, Valenti JR, Maestro A. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a multicenter prospective cohort study evaluating 3 different grafts using same bone drilling method. Clin J Sport Med 2011;21:294-300.
- (85) Peterson RK, Shelton WR, Bomboy AL. Allograft versus autograft patellar tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A 5-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 2001;17:9-13.