There is limited evidence in skeletally immature patients with torn ACLs, but it supports that the practitioner might perform surgical reconstruction because it reduces activity related disability and recurrent instability which may lead to additional injury.

There was one low and two very low strength studies comparing surgical reconstruction to non-operative treatment. 72, 88, 110 Surgical reconstruction demonstrated a significant advantage over non-operative treatment in objective knee stability (KT1000, pivot shift, Lachman), subjective knee function scores (IKDC, Zarins and Rowe score, Lysholm), and Tegner activity score. None of three studies reported a clinically significant valgus deformity or limb length discrepancy.

Benefits of Implementation
Potential benefits of implementing this recommendation include: improving knee stability and functional outcomes in skeletally immature patients with ACL injury.

Possible Harms of Implementation
Potential harms include: physeal injury, graft failure and surgical complications.

Future Research
Prospective studies on transphyseal versus all-epiphyseal reconstruction, intra-articular versus extra-articular techniques, and long-term outcomes of young patients following ACL reconstruction. Prospective comparative studies of non-operative treatment and ACL reconstruction in skeletally immature patients are necessary.



The Future of OrthoGuidelines


The OrthoGuidelines Process