Autograft, as compared to allograft, particularly in young and/or active patients, is favored for treatment based on lower graft ruptures/revisions. Ten low quality studies (Lenehan 2015, Yabroudi 2016, Steadman 2015, Schilaty 2017, Perkins 2019, Maletis 2017, Maletis 2016, Kane 2016, Kaeding 2017, Engelman 2014), improved IKDC scores based on 1 high (Jia 2015) and one moderate quality (Li 2015), knee laxity based on one moderate (Li 2015) and one low quality study (Zhang 2017) and return to activity based on one high (Nwachukwu 2017) and one low quality study (Mardani-Kivi 2020). Despite five high quality studies (Yoo 2017, Nwachukwu 2017, Sun 2015, Jia 2015, McCarthy 2017) which did not favor autograft or allograft, Li (2015) performed a randomized controls trail compared allograft, autograft, and a hybrid graft and found the autograft and hybrid had significant improvement in functional scores compared to allograft.
Benefits/Harms of Implementation
Use of autograft for primary ACL reconstruction reduces risk of re-injury and improves outcomes compared to allograft. Additional benefits include lower cost and avoiding risk (albeit low) of disease transmission. Potential harm of autograft use is increased surgical time (albeit short) and potential graft morbidity such as increased pain and functional deficits.
Outcome Importance
Graft re-tear is a very important outcome, perhaps the most important outcome, particularly in younger patients returning to high level activity and sport. Functional outcomes are probably the next most important outcome and also favor autograft use. Graft morbidity is a less significant outcome, although still important to consider, with some potential advantages with allograft, while infection risk is low.
Cost Effectiveness/Resource Utilization
Autograft is less expensive than allograft, even when considering surgical time for harvest. Lower re-tear rate is likely associated with cost savings as well.
Acceptability
Autograft use is readily acceptable as this graft choice should be part of the armamentarium of all surgeons performing ACL reconstruction.
Feasibility
Implementation is feasible as autograft use should be part of the armamentarium of all surgeons performing ACL reconstruction.
Future Research
Future research should evaluate the long-term consequences of differing graft options, as well as relative cost effectiveness.
- Engelman, G. H., Carry, P. M., Hitt, K. G., Polousky, J. D., Vidal, A. F. Comparison of allograft versus autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft survival in an active adolescent cohort. American Journal of Sports Medicine 2014; 10: 2311-8
- Jia, Y. H., Sun, P. F. Comparison of Clinical Outcome of Autograft and Allograft Reconstruction for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears. Chinese Medical Journal 2015; 23: 3163-6
- Kaeding, C. C., Pedroza, A. D., Reinke, E. K., Huston, L. J., Hewett, T. E., Flanigan, D. C., Moon Knee Group, Spindler, K. P. Change in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Choice and Outcomes Over Time. Arthroscopy 2017; 11: 2007-2014
- Kane, P. W., Wascher, J., Dodson, C. C., Hammoud, S., Cohen, S. B., Ciccotti, M. G. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus allograft in skeletally mature patients aged 25 years or younger. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 2016; 11: 3627-3633
- Lenehan, E. A., Payne, W. B., Askam, B. M., Grana, W. A., Farrow, L. D. Long-term outcomes of allograft reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. 2015; 5: 217-22
- Li, J., Wang, J., Li, Y., Shao, D., You, X., Shen, Y. A Prospective Randomized Study of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Autograft, gamma-Irradiated Allograft, and Hybrid Graft. Arthroscopy 2015; 7: 1296-302
- Maletis, G. B., Chen, J., Inacio, M. C. S., Love, R. M., Funahashi, T. T. Increased Risk of Revision After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Allografts Compared With Autografts. American Journal of Sports Medicine 2017; 6: 1333-1340
- Marcacci, M., Zaffagnini, S., Iacono, F., Neri, M. P., Petitto, A. Early versus late reconstruction for anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Results after five years of followup. American Journal of Sports Medicine 1995; 6: 690-3
- McCarthy, M., Mallett, K., Abola, M., Vassallo, S., Nguyen, J. Hospital for Special Surgery ACL Registry: 2-Year Outcomes Suggest Low Revision and Return to OR Rates. HSS Journal 2017; 2: 119-127
- Nwachukwu, B. U., Voleti, P. B., Berkanish, P., Chang, B., Cohn, M. R., Williams, R. J., 3rd, Allen, A. A. Return to Play and Patient Satisfaction After ACL Reconstruction: Study with Minimum 2-Year Follow-up. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery - American Volume 2017; 9: 720-725
- Perkins, C. A., Busch, M. T., Christino, M., Herzog, M. M., Willimon, S. C. Allograft Augmentation of Hamstring Anterior Cruciate Ligament Autografts Is Associated With Increased Graft Failure in Children and Adolescents. American Journal of Sports Medicine 2019; 7: 1576-1582
- Schilaty, N. D., Nagelli, C., Bates, N. A., Sanders, T. L., Krych, A. J., Stuart, M. J., Hewett, T. E. Incidence of Second Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears and Identification of Associated Risk Factors From 2001 to 2010 Using a Geographic Database. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine 2017; 8: 2325967117724196
- Steadman, J. R., Matheny, L. M., Hurst, J. M., Briggs, K. K. Patient-Centered Outcomes and Revision Rate in Patients Undergoing ACL Reconstruction Using Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft Compared With Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Allograft: A Matched Case-Control Study. Arthroscopy 2015; 12: 2320-6
- Sun, R., Chen, B. C., Wang, F., Wang, X. F., Chen, J. Q. Prospective randomized comparison of knee stability and joint degeneration for double- and single-bundle ACL reconstruction. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 2015; 4: 1171-8
- Yabroudi, M. A., Bjornsson, H., Lynch, A. D., Muller, B., Samuelsson, K., Tarabichi, M., Karlsson, J., Fu, F. H., Harner, C. D., Irrgang, J. J. Predictors of Revision Surgery After Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine 2016; 9: 2325967116666039
- Zhang, Q., Hao, G., Gu, M., Cao, X. Tibial tunnel enlargement and joint instability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A prospective comparison between autograft and allograft. Acta Cirurgica Brasileira 2017; 12: 1064-1074