GLENOID COMPONENT – PEGGED OR KEELED
Strong evidence supports that the clinician may utilize pegged or keeled glenoid components in patients with glenohumeral joint osteoarthritis and a well-functioning rotator cuff. Pegged components demonstrate less radiolucent lines, but the effect on clinical outcomes and survivorship are unclear
- (18) Gartsman GM, Roddey TS, Hammerman SM. Shoulder arthroplasty with or without resurfacing of the glenoid in patients who have osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000;82(1):26-34.
- Edwards, T. B., Sabonghy, E. P., Elkousy, H., Warnock, K. M., Hammerman, S. M., O'Connor, D. P., Gartsman, G. M. Glenoid component insertion in total shoulder arthroplasty: comparison of three techniques for drying the glenoid before cementation. Journal of Shoulder & Elbow Surgery 2007; 3: S107-10
- Lazarus, M. D., Jensen, K. L., Southworth, C., Matsen, F. A., 3rd The radiographic evaluation of keeled and pegged glenoid component insertion. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery - American Volume 2002; 7: 1174-82
- Throckmorton, T. W., Zarkadas, P. C., Sperling, J. W., Cofield, R. H. Pegged versus keeled glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty. Journal of Shoulder & Elbow Surgery 2010; 5: 726-33